sql-server

7 Post

oracle

8 Post

postgresql

11 Post

my-sql

2 Post

common-sql

2 Post

News

5 News

Parallel Query
Parallel Query Has Equivalent In

PostgreSQL Parallel Query

PostgreSQL Parallel Query is a feature that allows PostgreSQL to use multiple worker processes to execute one SQL query faster.

Instead of one backend process doing everything alone, PostgreSQL can split the workload and let multiple workers process parts of the query simultaneously.

Think of it like this:

  • Serial execution = one worker moves all boxes alone
  • Parallel execution = several workers move boxes together

For large data processing, the speedup can be significant.


What PostgreSQL Can Run in Parallel

Parallel SELECT

Main use case.

Large scans, analytics, aggregations, joins, reporting.

Parallel Index Scans

Some indexes can participate in parallel plans.

Parallel Aggregation

Large GROUP BY, counts, sums, averages.

Parallel Joins

Especially hash joins and merge joins on big datasets.

Parallel CREATE INDEX

Index creation can use multiple workers.

Vacuum / Maintenance (limited forms)

Some maintenance tasks also benefit from parallel workers depending on version and operation.


How It Works

When PostgreSQL chooses a parallel plan, it starts:

  • one Leader process
  • several Parallel Workers

The leader coordinates execution.

Workers read table blocks, filter rows, build hash tables, aggregate results, and return partial data.

Then PostgreSQL combines all partial results into the final answer.


Why It Can Be Faster

Imagine a table with 100 million rows.

Without Parallel Query

One process scans the whole table.

With Parallel Workers

Several workers each scan a portion of the table.

Instead of one person reading the whole library, several people read sections and combine notes.


Where PostgreSQL Parallel Query Is Excellent

Best use cases:

  • Large reporting queries
  • Data warehouse workloads
  • Big sequential scans
  • Aggregations
  • Historical data analysis
  • Large joins
  • Partitioned tables
  • ETL reading workloads
  • Analytical dashboards

Where It Is Not Good

Usually avoid expecting benefit for:

  • Single-row lookups
  • Tiny tables
  • Very short queries
  • High-frequency OLTP lookups
  • Queries already using efficient index seeks
  • Workloads with constant small commits

Sometimes starting workers costs more than the gain.


Why It Can Slow or Stress a System

Parallel query is powerful, but heavy.

If too many users run parallel workloads at once:

  • CPU usage rises sharply
  • RAM pressure increases
  • Disk I/O increases
  • Temp files may grow
  • Context switching increases
  • Other sessions may slow down

Example:

10 users × 8 workers = many active processes competing together.

So yes, bad usage can hurt the system.


Best Practice

Use parallelism:

  • for heavy analytics
  • for batch workloads
  • for large scans
  • after testing
  • with realistic worker limits

Do not assume every query should be parallel.


Very Important Truth

Parallel Query does not fix bad SQL.

If a query has:

  • bad joins
  • wrong filters
  • missing indexes
  • poor statistics
  • unnecessary sorting
  • bad logic

then PostgreSQL may simply run a bad query faster while consuming more resources.


Key Benefit of PostgreSQL Parallel Query

PostgreSQL’s strong point is:

Smart Cost-Based Parallelism in Open Architecture

PostgreSQL automatically decides whether parallel execution is worth using, based on planner cost estimates and settings.

It is especially respected for:

  • strong analytics on modern hardware
  • parallel sequential scans
  • parallel aggregates
  • parallel joins
  • partitioned table analysis
  • continuous improvements each version
  • open-source flexibility and tuning freedom

Oracle vs PostgreSQL Parallel Query Comparison

Area

Oracle Database

PostgreSQL

Parallel SELECT

Excellent

Excellent

Parallel INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE

Very strong, mature

More limited vs Oracle

Parallel CREATE INDEX

Strong

Strong

Parallel Maintenance

Broad enterprise tooling

Growing and improving

Automatic Control

Mature enterprise controls

Cost-based planner driven

Large DW Workloads

Elite level

Very strong

Operational Breadth

Wider engine integration

Stronger focus on query execution

Licensing Model

Commercial

Open source